Are the natures of women and globalization compatible?
Are the natures of women and globalization compatible?
Lalit Kishore (Haliq News, Posted April 8th, 2009), Reproduce here
While explaining the feminine psyche, Mascarenhas (1993) says that in
girls, their increased activity to become adult is directed inwards, towards
their minds and feelings due to their innate capacity for emotion, empathy,
intuition and creativity. She further says that only by having correct
understanding of one's personality. i. e., femininity and masculinity we can
ensure that men and women understand each other and develop their own
personalities to their fullest potential.
According to Mascarenhas, femininity implies empathy, emotion or feeling
strongly enough to do something; intuitiveness. While masculinity, on the other
hand, has a special character of being direct, linearly logical and rational,
aggressive and physical. Accordingly the Greek symbols to represent man is the
arrow and for women the mirror reflecting her feelings.
• Globalization stands for integrating the economy of a country with the global economy by opening it to direct foreign investment.
• Globalization is more concerned with the creation of infrastructure facilities to foreign companies in different areas of economic activities in a country by removing obstacles to the entry of the multinationals.
• The driving forces of the present day globalization are markets and returns on investment by opening new economic activities and employment to millions of people. And, it is limited to that aspect only.
• It is equally important to understand what the sociological outcomes of globalization are. It is encouraging unequal competition, aggressive pursuits and monopolistic tendencies and hence enhanced male dominance.
• Globalization does not lead to an encompassing benefits and social transformation since it is central to trade and market economy.
• The nature of globalization is characterized by competition and aggressiveness, which cannot work as an alternative to status quo to the present male-dominated market economy and social set-up. It would never challenge the traditional gender roles.
• Incorporating women in production labour under the presently wave of corporate globalization is a ploy to have compliant and docile work force. But the question arises 'Can women experience security and have equity when the whole enterprise revolves around competition and warrior culture?'.
• Globalization is based upon masculine perspective of market economy and generally leads to masculinization of women. Furthermore, women and their in the market economy projected as workers or consumers or commodities through advertising campaigns.
• On the whole, globalization has impacted upon gender relations in a complex and contradictory way. It has not been supportive of equality between men and women. Globalization has no space for gendered self-determination. Market forces are in pursuit of global profits rather than gender equality. There is no reflection of gender equity in their normative policy and operational work. In fact, globalization is a new stage of capitalist development which can only thrive on the basis of social and gender inequity.
Analysis
According to focus group discussion, the dominant gendered voice is against the present wave of globalization. It is felt that gender issue has not been implicated in the globalization process and practices. Presently, globalization and gender equity are mutually contesting concepts.
Conclusion
In its present state, the process and mechanisms of globalization are not
addressing the issue of gender equity. There is a need to raise and sustain a
global gender agenda and work towards a globalization process which is gender
inclusive.
Comments
Post a Comment